Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links
Soybean predators: Nature behaving
naturally
March 31, 2003
By Nancy L. Torner
Center for Rural and Regional Studies
Text version of this story
Soybeans just are not adding up for Mike Hewitt.
"We're having a terrible time growing soybeans
-- disease, insects -- so we're trying something different," Hewitt,
who farms 1,200 acres near Walnut Grove, said in a recent interview.
This year, Hewitt is planting some wheat instead.
"Hopefully, by planting wheat, we're going to pick
up yield on our corn and our soybeans later on by staying out
of those crops long enough," Hewitt said. "That's what we're planning
on, anyway."
Hewitt has company. Seed representatives say they
are seeing a small, but noticeable decline in soybean seed sales
this year. Lower yields are part of the reason.
"It used to be pretty easy if you took your corn
yield and divided it by a third, that was what your soybeans should
yield, and I don't think we're seeing that anymore," Jerry Louwagie,
a sales representative for Monsanto said.
Farmers harvested 7.1 million acres of soybeans
statewide in 2002, for an average yield of 43.5 bushels per acre
and total production of 309 million bushels, according to the
Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Service. Despite this record
yield, dwindling production plagues different farmers across southwest
Minnesota.
"It's kind of like the movie 'Field of Dreams,'"
Bruce Potter, an integrated pest management specialist in the
entomology department at the Southwest Outreach Center in Lamberton,
said. "If you grow more and more soybeans, over time, things will
come in to utilize soybeans as a food source. It's just nature
behaving like it's supposed to."
|
Weather drives ag enemies
Accurately predicting what problems
might plague crops this year is harder than predicting the
weather, and weather drives the biological processes that
affect crops.
Yet people are far more forgiving
of faulty weather predictions, Bruce Potter, an integrated
pest management specialist in the entomology department
at the Southwest Outreach Center in Lamberton, said.
"It's much better to be a climatologist
because people are much more willing to forgive miscalculations
in that area than they ever are in me saying we're going
to have a bean leaf problem or a corn bore problem," Potter
said.
According to climatologists for
Salomon Smith Barney, this spring should bring moisture.
Based on weather patterns dating back 108 years, springs
that follow an El Nino event typically have a wet bias,
according to data from the firm. With only one exception
in 1928, extreme dryness in winter has broken in April or
May.
"If the biological model that we
use is right, there should be a lot less problems with the
bean leaf beetle," Potter said. "Again, that's a model and
I won't swear to that until I see the bean leaf beetles
this spring."
Potter expects little change in
corn rootworm populations. Meanwhile, corn bores are picking
up, more in the east than west, but this could change in
summer.
"If it's wet, especially early
in the season, we'll have root rot problems, and it depends
on whether it's hot and wet or cold and wet which ones are
the big issues," he said. "If it's cool and wet during flowering,
we'll probably get white mold."
Potter isn't making any predictions
about soybean aphids, but he notes they are able to over-winter,
at least in the southern two-thirds of Minnesota. Other
pests, such as inch worms, can't survive winter but move
into the state from the south.
"Problems depend on the weather,"
he said.
-- Nancy L. Torner
A text version of this sidebar is included with the main
story's text version. |
Problems range from leaf beetles, aphids and mold
to root rot, iron deficiency chlorosis and tiny worms called cyst
nematodes. And last year, a soybean disease called sudden death
syndrome showed up in the state for the first time. The severity
from year to year depends on a range of factors, such as soil
type, water, planting practices and weather.
"Everything is here to stay, and what it means
is if we keep growing soybeans, for example, we just have to be
better at managing," Potter said. "And that means more inputs
as far as developing genetics, and it also means more inputs as
far as people having to manage things, watch what crops they have
in the fields, maybe change rotations to counter certain problems."
Tillage makes some problems worse and others better,
and it has no affect on still others, he said. For instance, tilling
might help root rot by drying out soils, but fungicide trials
show that heavily tilled land sometimes performs worse because
it can compact soils more.
Adding a third crop rotation can help some problems,
but no single crop is the answer for the region, Potter said.
It depends in part on a farmer's mindset and requires weighing
the long-term benefits of an added rotation.
"What happens is everybody looks at things one
year at a time, and that's where we get into trouble," Potter
said.
It also depends on what farmers think they can
sell and the steps they take to sell it, said Jim Orf, a professor
in the department of agronomy and plant genetics at Minnesota
State University who works on developing soybean varieties.
"There aren't as many crops that really look all
that good, at least from an economic standpoint," Orf said.
This might change depending in part on the farm
bill, which has a large impact on what people plant. Soybeans
are less favorable than before, and with lower yields, other crops
might look more attractive, Orf said.
"Farmers need to look at the specifics of their
local situation and try to take advantage of what opportunities
might be there on a local basis," Orf said. "There are opportunities
pretty much any place, but it takes a little leg work or some
phone calls, some effort."
Extension offices don't have all the answers, but
they can help, Orf said. Studies and testing are ongoing to help
improve yields and resistance. He tests soybeans from the public
sector for such things as yields, resistance and the content of
oil and protein and publishes results in the Variety Trials Bulletin.
Salliana Stetina, a plant pathologist at the Lamberton
Center and an assistant professor in the agronomy program at Southwest
State University (SSU) in Marshall, is studying ways to diversify
the crop system and to add a cover crop without taking away from
the regular crops. Her primary concern is cyst nematodes, one
of the region's major problems.
Cyst nematodes first surfaced in the 1950s in North
Carolina. They infiltrated southern Minnesota in the 1970s and
now exist all the way up to the Red River Valley, she said. Wind,
water, animals and farm equipment all help to transport them.
Changing rotations won't kill them because they are capable of
remaining dormant for a decade or longer, but it will lower their
numbers.
Cleaning farm equipment and tools, working non-infested
fields before infested fields, planting lower yield varieties
with some resistance and alternating varieties are helpful also,
she said. However, limited diversity among soybean plants restricts
choices, and alternating suppliers is no guarantee varieties are
different, Stetina said.
"You think you've got two different suppliers,
but there's a lot of overlap in the genetics," Stetina said.
Iron chlorosis, an iron deficiency problem, is
another major drain on soybean yields in southwest Minnesota and
parts of South Dakota and Iowa, said Lori Scott, an assistant
professor in the agronomy program at SSU. She is field-testing
varieties for tolerance to this condition. She also is testing
seeds with extra iron and studying the best concentration of plants.
"We know that when plants are more densely populated,
they sort of help each other overcome the problems," Scott said.
Testing is entering only the third year, too early
for any planting recommendations, she said.
"I'm always looking for collaborators," Scott said.
"I usually ask (farmers) for about an acre of really bad land."
Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links