Regional Journalism Project
Journalism Project | Stories | Contributors | Journalism Links

Farmland values approaching former highs
By Nancy L. Torner
Center for Rural and Regional Studies

The upward spiral in farmland values shows no signs of peaking, according to county assessors and lenders in Southwest Minnesota.

Some counties are recording sales approaching or as high as transactions in the eighties before the bottom dropped out. More outside investors are purchasing land today, but the majority of buyers are local, well-established farmers.

Green acres raise value, lower taxes
     The Minnesota Department of Revenue watches to see that border values for counties remain within 10 percent of each other. The green acres program allows counties to accomplish this by valuing certain farmland at market value and at a lower green acre value for tax purposes.
     McCleod County entered the program last year because of rising land values in green acre counties to the east and north, County Assessor Hal Kirchoff said. Other counties in the region might need to enter the program if border values continue to escalate under the influence of urban sprawl.
     Under the program, eligible farmers pay taxes based on the lower value. The state equalizes on the higher value.
     To qualify, a person must have owned the land for seven years or must homestead it.
     "That keeps the investor out," Kirchoff said. "Otherwise, what would happen is they would pounce on smaller cities close to the metro area and buy up all the land and then get rewarded with a lower tax."
     Not all farmers who qualify for the program have chosen to participate, and Kirchoff is unsure why. The program's only drawback in his mind is if farmers sell land to someone who fails to qualify for green acres. Then, farmers are responsible for three years of back taxes for the difference between the green and market values.
     "The difference last year was about $4 an acre, but this year the spread is getting wider," Kirchoff said. "So, if you had 100 acres, the spread was $400, and up to three years, that would make it $1,200. Even so, what is happening most of the time, when I talk to Carver County, is that the title companies are putting that deferred tax right in the closing clause."

-- Nancy L. Torner


  • Text version of these stories
  • No one can predict what the market will bear, but most hope circumstances today are different.

    Lenders say interest rates are considerably lower now and that banks generally demand higher down payments. Their customers either are using farmland they already own as collateral or are transferring cash from other investments to make down payments (see related story).

    Some county assessors who were around when land values took a dive in the eighties say they cannot help but be a little nervous. Others say current conditions might have changed the equation for calculating cash flow, making the rise less serious than before.

    "I would hope something is different -- I would hope that the lenders are being a little bit more careful," Laurel Walker, Murray County assessor said.

    Low interest rates for investments and loans probably contribute to the spiral, Walker said.

    "People can invest in that land probably feeling that they'll have a better chance of making some money than putting it in CDs at the present interest rates," Walker said. "They're scared of the stock market right now and the low interest for money to buy land is attractive. But it still has to pencil out or it's not worth it."

    Normally, $700 to $800 would be a high sale in Lincoln County, assessor Bruce Nielsen said. However, in recent months he has seen a dozen sales at more than $1,200 an acre. Consequently, even though he increased values about 25 percent this year, he still is low by about 25 percent.

    "Hopefully we get some sales in over the course of the next six months that are going to turn some of that around," Nielsen said.

    A seller's market

    Current land prices are good for sellers and bad for buyers trying to expand, Tom Houselog, Rock County assessor said.

    "You're not seeing young farmers getting going," Houselog said. "These are well established farmers that are just expanding."

    The number of sales has dropped considerably in the last two or three years, but what is selling is going for much higher than its current value, he said. Average tillable values range from $1,290 to $2,089, and land is selling for $2,500 to $3,000.

    "That's kind of uncomfortable," Farley Grunig, Pipestone County assessor said.

    The danger is that the market is based on other people having that much faith in the future, he said.

    "People have to go in it with their eyes open," Grunig said. "It's like somebody told me a long time ago -- if you can pay cash, nothing's too expensive. So if you have that philosophy, that's fine. But if you're buying on credit, I don't know.


    Banks more cautious lending money today
    By Nancy L. Torner
    Center for Rural and Regional Studies

         Whether people want money to buy farmland or to pay off contracts for deeds, or whether they want to borrow against farmland they already own because land values are so high, lending institutions are more conservative than they were in the eighties, according to bankers in southwest Minnesota.
         Given the economic situation today, unless people pay cash for farmland it is a foolish investment, Chad Drake, vice president of the Bremer Bank in Marshall, said.
         "People ask me all the time, is this land worth this amount of money,"Drake said. "I'm here to tell you if you can pay for it, I'm not here to tell you where to spend your money."
         What people need to consider is where land values might be in five to 10 years, he said.
         "If it drops $500 an acre, then what did you really return?"he asked. "Then it's no different than having the money in the stock market and actually losing it. But I think people can touch this stuff and they think it's good."
         The few who borrow money to buy land generally pledge an additional security of another parcel they own or they put up their house, he said. "You don't see a lot of people buying land that have just saved a bunch of money up to get a down payment,"Drake said.
         High land prices are keeping many people out of the market, Jim Boeve executive vice president of Minnwest Bank in Luverne said.
         "It's different than in the eighties -- in the eighties everything was leveraged. We were loaning way more against the land than what we do today,"Boeve said.
         Today, the bank demands a down payment of up to 50 percent of the price, he said.
         "The young farmer is not able to enter into it because he cannot afford it, the smaller farmers aren't able to compete for the purchase of this land, and it just makes it tougher for everybody else when land gets too high,"Boeve said.
         "It's all part of the trend in the consolidation in the ag sector. It's unfortunate for small communities to see that happen, but that's the trend. The margins seem to get narrower and narrower, so they're trying to get more land, and to get more land means you're competing against your neighbor, which drives the price up.
         "In the long run that is a concern because we can't just keep seeing our land prices go up and then being able to survive under the present scenario.
         Something else has to change in order for that to continue to happen. So, there's got to be a correction someplace, or the people that have cash finally run out of money."
         Because of lending policies, people buying land today can afford it, Doug Ehlers, vice president of first Federal Savings Bank in Morris said.
         "The young guys are just really left out of this equation. Whether you like it or not, it's just the way it is,"he said. "In this area, generally there's a lot of what I would term as old money. They have money in savings, they have money in other vehicles-- CDs and that sort of thing and of course they aren't worth a ding-dang any more-- and they see that the value of land is really about the only thing that's gone up decently in the last five years."
         If land values drop suddenly, it is a calculated error and they will have to live with it, he said.
         However, what is similar to the eighties is that people want to borrow for other purposes against land they already own.
         "Land that five years ago was worth $1,000, $1,200 has almost doubled in value at this point. Now is it worth more? No. To a certain extent it grows a little better crop, but not twice as good. Is it going to continue to rise? I don't know, and nobody can know that. We'll know when it falls,"he said.
         Consequently, bankers need to calculate whether farmers can produce enough to make loan payments, he said.
         "That's where it gets a little bit dicey,"Ehlers said. "You can go ahead and string a person out way too far."
         It is particularly tough explaining to retired farmers who rent out their land that they are unable to borrow more money, he said. They see their neighbors' property sell for $2,000 and acre, so they think their worth is greater.
         "You have to make it clear that they can't get enough cash rent to pay for this,"Ehlers said.
         Most bankers do the same, or they won't last long, he said.
         "Most people know that you've just got to put a level on this thing,"Ehlers said. "But you never know -- if a person really wants to borrow it bad enough, they'll find a way."
         If they can make their payments, it's fine, he said. Otherwise, banks have to repossess land that now is worth only a fraction of what it was before; farmers loose their land and other assets and could end up declaring bankruptcy.
         "That's why you've really got to pick your spots,"Ehlers said. "You can't be lending just wildly to people that don't really have the financial means because that situation [in the eighties] could happen again-- it's possible."

    "Almost every sale that we had in 1987, '88, was by farm credit or some other lending institution where they had taken property back and were reselling it. It just basically destroyed the market for a period there, and we ran a lot of people out of business and other people just got bigger."

    McCleod County Assessor Hal Kirchoff suspects many farmers are putting up land they already own as collateral and trying to balance the sheet.

    "They tried to do that in the eighties and it didn't (work)," he said.

    Most farmland in McCleod County is selling in the $2,000 range, but some land about a mile outside Glencoe recently sold for about $4,500 an acre, he said.

    "Even at $2,000 an acre, if you get 6 percent interest on it, you're looking at $120 an acre. You might be able to get that in rent, but then you've got tax, which might be anywhere from $10 to $20 an acre, and insurance, so there's really no way that that's going to cash flow," Kirchoff said. "The only thing is if the farm subsidies are still a factor in that price."

    Many sales in Brown County -- where values are up 15 percent on average -- went through before people really knew anything about the new farm program, assessor Judy Friesen said. Only time will tell if and how the bill will affect future sales, she said.

    In Chippewa County many of the sales have been cash, said assessor Carole Schutz, who had just started working in the assessor's office in the eighties when land values took a dive.

    "Land was selling for over $2,000 an acre, and now we're starting to get back there. We've had some sales of $1,900 an acre," Schutz said. "My ratios are like 75 percent. That's not encouraging. And that's scary to me in the respect that if you listen to what's going on in the farm economy, I don't know how people can make it cash flow."

    With land selling for $2,400 to $2,600 an acre in Nobles County, making it cash flow is impossible, assessor Byron Swart said. Manure generated from confinement barns is coming into play on poorer land in the western part of the county.

    "[Farmers] are not going to give it away, they're not going to pay to get rid of it, so they're buying more farmland to put it on," Swart said.

    Prices in Yellow Medicine County are a couple of hundred dollars below the eighties' high, but it still is a worry, assessor Connie Erickson said.

    "The sales certainly don't reflect what the farm economy is," she said.

    Rental rates are up as well, Gale Bondhus, Cottonwood County assessor said.

    "We're trying to figure out how in the world they're going to generate the income to pay for it," Bondhus said. "Time will tell, I guess."

    Cash flow might have changed

    Normally when you talk of cash flowing a property, interest rates are higher, Dave Oelslager, Kandiyohi County assessor said.

    "Ten or 15 years ago [rates] were as high as 10-plus percent," Oelslager said. "Now, an average mortgage on a piece of farmland might be half that. So, what is a cash flow? It is possibly a little different formula now than it was three or four years ago."

    If you talk to farmers and look at the economics, it doesn't seem to make sense, Edward Pederson, Swift County assessor said. However, the purchasing power and worth of a dollar is less than it was in 1982.

    "Then you kind of wonder is it that high then. Dollar for dollar it certainly is the same number," he said.

    The break-even point right now in Jackson County is probably less than $1,200 an acre, assessor Larry Bahr said. People are paying considerably more than this for land but nowhere near the high-water mark of $3,000 to $3,800 in the eighties.

    "Every time I see the economy starting to suffer I see farmland increase in value. And the only reasoning behind that in my mind is that you can still get some sort of a halfway decent percentage return on your money, whether it's going to be a good crop year and you do OK that way or you end up with a government payment," Bahr said.

    The top value in Renville County is around $2,000, but land has sold for as high as $2,800, assessor Delton Zimmer said.

    "What's scary is if you do a survey sometime of the average age of a farmer out here. Who's going to take over these large corporations?" Zimmer asked. "Will it be all big corporations and investors and we'll be cotton pickers out here? Who's going to have the capital to buy them out? A young person cannot, and they don't have any kids that are interested in it."

    If you talk to the old-timers, they remember when building sites were everywhere, Zimmer said. An average farm today is close to 8,000 acres.

    "The buildings are gone, the groves are gone, the line fences are gone, there's nothing to stop the wind, the snow," he said.

    Farmland values on the rise in Southwest Minnesota
    Most counties also saw an increase in values last year, and some anticipate another increase next year unless the current pattern of sales changes. Since October, top sales in some counties have been anywhere from $300 to $900 higher than current values.



    County Average rise in tillable farmland values (some counties reported a range) Range in approximate,
    average tillable
    farmland values
    Big Stone 18% $600-$1,300
    Brown 15% $2,258 (average)
    Chippewa 2-3% $1,020-$1,663 (low end)
    Cottonwood 0% Not available
    Jackson 1.5% $1,272-$2,048
    Kandiyohi 5-10% Not available
    Lac Qui Parle 5% $1,250 (median)
    Lincoln 25% $400-$1,400
    Lyon 10% $1,000-$1,900
    Martin 6% $2,400 (high end)
    Meeker 0-15% $1,200-$2,000
    McLeod 23% $1,400-$2,100 *
    Murray 7-10% $1,100-$1,700
    Nobles 10% $1,000-$2,100
    Pipestone 15% $1,800 (average)
    Redwood 0% Not available
    Renville 5% $1,318-$1,963
    Rock 5-20% $1,290-$2,089
    Swift 12-15% $700-$1,700
    Yellow Medicine 6% $608-$1,571
    * Farmland in the green acres program is valued at $1,850 to $2,800, but farmers are assessed based on the lower values.
    Source: county assessors                       Compiled by Nancy L. Torner

    Data for this chart is included in the file that holds the text versions of these stories. Click here to link to an Excel version of this chart.


    Journalism Project | Stories | Contributors | Journalism Links



    Science and Technology 203
    Southwest Minnesota State University
    1501 State Street · Marshall, MN 56258
    Phone: (507) 537-6226
    Fax: (507) 537-6147

    Last updated: February 1, 2006