Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links
Farmland values approaching
former highs
By Nancy L. Torner
Center for Rural and Regional Studies
The upward spiral in farmland values shows no
signs of peaking, according to county assessors and lenders
in Southwest Minnesota.
Some counties are recording sales approaching
or as high as transactions in the eighties before the bottom
dropped out. More outside investors are purchasing land today,
but the majority of buyers are local, well-established farmers.
Green
acres raise value, lower taxes
The Minnesota Department
of Revenue watches to see that border values
for counties remain within 10 percent of each
other. The green acres program allows counties
to accomplish this by valuing certain farmland
at market value and at a lower green acre
value for tax purposes.
McCleod County entered
the program last year because of rising land
values in green acre counties to the east
and north, County Assessor Hal Kirchoff said.
Other counties in the region might need to
enter the program if border values continue
to escalate under the influence of urban sprawl.
Under the program,
eligible farmers pay taxes based on the lower
value. The state equalizes on the higher value.
To qualify, a person
must have owned the land for seven years or
must homestead it.
"That keeps the investor
out," Kirchoff said. "Otherwise, what would
happen is they would pounce on smaller cities
close to the metro area and buy up all the
land and then get rewarded with a lower tax."
Not all farmers who
qualify for the program have chosen to participate,
and Kirchoff is unsure why. The program's
only drawback in his mind is if farmers sell
land to someone who fails to qualify for green
acres. Then, farmers are responsible for three
years of back taxes for the difference between
the green and market values.
"The difference last
year was about $4 an acre, but this year the
spread is getting wider," Kirchoff said. "So,
if you had 100 acres, the spread was $400,
and up to three years, that would make it
$1,200. Even so, what is happening most of
the time, when I talk to Carver County, is
that the title companies are putting that
deferred tax right in the closing clause."
--
Nancy L. Torner
Text
version of these stories
|
|
|
No one can predict what the market will bear,
but most hope circumstances today are different.
Lenders say interest rates are considerably lower
now and that banks generally demand higher down payments. Their
customers either are using farmland they already own as collateral
or are transferring cash from other investments to make down
payments (see related story).
Some county assessors who were around when land
values took a dive in the eighties say they cannot help but
be a little nervous. Others say current conditions might have
changed the equation for calculating cash flow, making the rise
less serious than before.
"I would hope something is different -- I would
hope that the lenders are being a little bit more careful,"
Laurel Walker, Murray County assessor said.
Low interest rates for investments and loans
probably contribute to the spiral, Walker said.
"People can invest in that land probably feeling
that they'll have a better chance of making some money than
putting it in CDs at the present interest rates," Walker said.
"They're scared of the stock market right now and the low interest
for money to buy land is attractive. But it still has to pencil
out or it's not worth it."
Normally, $700 to $800 would be a high sale in
Lincoln County, assessor Bruce Nielsen said. However, in recent
months he has seen a dozen sales at more than $1,200 an acre.
Consequently, even though he increased values about 25 percent
this year, he still is low by about 25 percent.
"Hopefully we get some sales in over the course
of the next six months that are going to turn some of that around,"
Nielsen said.
A seller's
market
Current land prices are good for sellers and
bad for buyers trying to expand, Tom Houselog, Rock County assessor
said.
"You're not seeing young farmers getting going,"
Houselog said. "These are well established farmers that are
just expanding."
The number of sales has dropped considerably
in the last two or three years, but what is selling is going
for much higher than its current value, he said. Average tillable
values range from $1,290 to $2,089, and land is selling for
$2,500 to $3,000.
"That's kind of uncomfortable," Farley Grunig,
Pipestone County assessor said.
The danger is that the market is based on other
people having that much faith in the future, he said.
"People have to go in it with their eyes open,"
Grunig said. "It's like somebody told me a long time ago --
if you can pay cash, nothing's too expensive. So if you have
that philosophy, that's fine. But if you're buying on credit,
I don't know.
|
Banks more cautious lending money today
By Nancy L. Torner
Center for Rural and Regional Studies
Whether people want money to
buy farmland or to pay off contracts for deeds, or whether
they want to borrow against farmland they already own
because land values are so high, lending institutions
are more conservative than they were in the eighties,
according to bankers in southwest Minnesota.
Given the economic situation
today, unless people pay cash for farmland it is a foolish
investment, Chad Drake, vice president of the Bremer Bank
in Marshall, said.
"People ask me all the time,
is this land worth this amount of money,"Drake said. "I'm
here to tell you if you can pay for it, I'm not here to
tell you where to spend your money."
What people need to consider
is where land values might be in five to 10 years, he
said.
"If it drops $500 an acre, then
what did you really return?"he asked. "Then it's no different
than having the money in the stock market and actually
losing it. But I think people can touch this stuff and
they think it's good."
The few who borrow money to buy
land generally pledge an additional security of another
parcel they own or they put up their house, he said. "You
don't see a lot of people buying land that have just saved
a bunch of money up to get a down payment,"Drake said.
High land prices are keeping
many people out of the market, Jim Boeve executive vice
president of Minnwest Bank in Luverne said.
"It's different than in the eighties
-- in the eighties everything was leveraged. We were loaning
way more against the land than what we do today,"Boeve
said.
Today, the bank demands a down
payment of up to 50 percent of the price, he said.
"The young farmer is not able
to enter into it because he cannot afford it, the smaller
farmers aren't able to compete for the purchase of this
land, and it just makes it tougher for everybody else
when land gets too high,"Boeve said.
"It's all part of the trend in
the consolidation in the ag sector. It's unfortunate for
small communities to see that happen, but that's the trend.
The margins seem to get narrower and narrower, so they're
trying to get more land, and to get more land means you're
competing against your neighbor, which drives the price
up.
"In the long run that is a concern
because we can't just keep seeing our land prices go up
and then being able to survive under the present scenario.
Something else has to change
in order for that to continue to happen. So, there's got
to be a correction someplace, or the people that have
cash finally run out of money."
Because of lending policies,
people buying land today can afford it, Doug Ehlers, vice
president of first Federal Savings Bank in Morris said.
"The young guys are just really
left out of this equation. Whether you like it or not,
it's just the way it is,"he said. "In this area, generally
there's a lot of what I would term as old money. They
have money in savings, they have money in other vehicles--
CDs and that sort of thing and of course they aren't worth
a ding-dang any more-- and they see that the value of
land is really about the only thing that's gone up decently
in the last five years."
If land values drop suddenly,
it is a calculated error and they will have to live with
it, he said.
However, what is similar to the
eighties is that people want to borrow for other purposes
against land they already own.
"Land that five years ago was
worth $1,000, $1,200 has almost doubled in value at this
point. Now is it worth more? No. To a certain extent it
grows a little better crop, but not twice as good. Is
it going to continue to rise? I don't know, and nobody
can know that. We'll know when it falls,"he said.
Consequently, bankers need to
calculate whether farmers can produce enough to make loan
payments, he said.
"That's where it gets a little
bit dicey,"Ehlers said. "You can go ahead and string a
person out way too far."
It is particularly tough explaining
to retired farmers who rent out their land that they are
unable to borrow more money, he said. They see their neighbors'
property sell for $2,000 and acre, so they think their
worth is greater.
"You have to make it clear that
they can't get enough cash rent to pay for this,"Ehlers
said.
Most bankers do the same, or
they won't last long, he said.
"Most people know that you've
just got to put a level on this thing,"Ehlers said. "But
you never know -- if a person really wants to borrow it
bad enough, they'll find a way."
If they can make their payments,
it's fine, he said. Otherwise, banks have to repossess
land that now is worth only a fraction of what it was
before; farmers loose their land and other assets and
could end up declaring bankruptcy.
"That's why you've really got
to pick your spots,"Ehlers said. "You can't be lending
just wildly to people that don't really have the financial
means because that situation [in the eighties] could happen
again-- it's possible." |
"Almost every sale that we had in 1987, '88,
was by farm credit or some other lending institution where they
had taken property back and were reselling it. It just basically
destroyed the market for a period there, and we ran a lot of
people out of business and other people just got bigger."
McCleod County Assessor Hal Kirchoff suspects
many farmers are putting up land they already own as collateral
and trying to balance the sheet.
"They tried to do that in the eighties and it
didn't (work)," he said.
Most farmland in McCleod County is selling in
the $2,000 range, but some land about a mile outside Glencoe
recently sold for about $4,500 an acre, he said.
"Even at $2,000 an acre, if you get 6 percent
interest on it, you're looking at $120 an acre. You might be
able to get that in rent, but then you've got tax, which might
be anywhere from $10 to $20 an acre, and insurance, so there's
really no way that that's going to cash flow," Kirchoff said.
"The only thing is if the farm subsidies are still a factor
in that price."
Many sales in Brown County -- where values are
up 15 percent on average -- went through before people really
knew anything about the new farm program, assessor Judy Friesen
said. Only time will tell if and how the bill will affect future
sales, she said.
In Chippewa County many of the sales have been
cash, said assessor Carole Schutz, who had just started working
in the assessor's office in the eighties when land values took
a dive.
"Land was selling for over $2,000 an acre, and
now we're starting to get back there. We've had some sales of
$1,900 an acre," Schutz said. "My ratios are like 75 percent.
That's not encouraging. And that's scary to me in the respect
that if you listen to what's going on in the farm economy, I
don't know how people can make it cash flow."
With land selling for $2,400 to $2,600 an acre
in Nobles County, making it cash flow is impossible, assessor
Byron Swart said. Manure generated from confinement barns is
coming into play on poorer land in the western part of the county.
"[Farmers] are not going to give it away, they're
not going to pay to get rid of it, so they're buying more farmland
to put it on," Swart said.
Prices in Yellow Medicine County are a couple
of hundred dollars below the eighties' high, but it still is
a worry, assessor Connie Erickson said.
"The sales certainly don't reflect what the farm
economy is," she said.
Rental rates are up as well, Gale Bondhus, Cottonwood
County assessor said.
"We're trying to figure out how in the world
they're going to generate the income to pay for it," Bondhus
said. "Time will tell, I guess."
Cash flow
might have changed
Normally when you talk of cash flowing a property,
interest rates are higher, Dave Oelslager, Kandiyohi County
assessor said.
"Ten or 15 years ago [rates] were as high as
10-plus percent," Oelslager said. "Now, an average mortgage
on a piece of farmland might be half that. So, what is a cash
flow? It is possibly a little different formula now than it
was three or four years ago."
If you talk to farmers and look at the economics,
it doesn't seem to make sense, Edward Pederson, Swift County
assessor said. However, the purchasing power and worth of a
dollar is less than it was in 1982.
"Then you kind of wonder is it that high then.
Dollar for dollar it certainly is the same number," he said.
The break-even point right now in Jackson County
is probably less than $1,200 an acre, assessor Larry Bahr said.
People are paying considerably more than this for land but nowhere
near the high-water mark of $3,000 to $3,800 in the eighties.
"Every time I see the economy starting to suffer
I see farmland increase in value. And the only reasoning behind
that in my mind is that you can still get some sort of a halfway
decent percentage return on your money, whether it's going to
be a good crop year and you do OK that way or you end up with
a government payment," Bahr said.
The top value in Renville County is around $2,000,
but land has sold for as high as $2,800, assessor Delton Zimmer
said.
"What's scary is if you do a survey sometime
of the average age of a farmer out here. Who's going to take
over these large corporations?" Zimmer asked. "Will it be all
big corporations and investors and we'll be cotton pickers out
here? Who's going to have the capital to buy them out? A young
person cannot, and they don't have any kids that are interested
in it."
If you talk to the old-timers, they remember
when building sites were everywhere, Zimmer said. An average
farm today is close to 8,000 acres.
"The buildings are gone, the groves are gone,
the line fences are gone, there's nothing to stop the wind,
the snow," he said.
|
Farmland
values on the rise in Southwest Minnesota
|
| Most
counties also saw an increase in values last year, and
some anticipate another increase next year unless the
current pattern of sales changes. Since October, top sales
in some counties have been anywhere from $300 to $900
higher than current values. |
|
|
|
| County |
Average
rise in tillable farmland values (some counties reported
a range) |
Range
in approximate,
average tillable
farmland values |
| Big Stone |
18% |
$600-$1,300 |
| Brown |
15% |
$2,258
(average) |
| Chippewa |
2-3% |
$1,020-$1,663
(low end) |
| Cottonwood |
0% |
Not
available |
| Jackson |
1.5% |
$1,272-$2,048 |
| Kandiyohi |
5-10% |
Not
available |
| Lac Qui Parle |
5% |
$1,250
(median) |
| Lincoln |
25% |
$400-$1,400 |
| Lyon |
10% |
$1,000-$1,900 |
| Martin |
6% |
$2,400
(high end) |
| Meeker |
0-15% |
$1,200-$2,000 |
| McLeod |
23% |
$1,400-$2,100
* |
| Murray |
7-10% |
$1,100-$1,700 |
| Nobles |
10% |
$1,000-$2,100 |
| Pipestone |
15% |
$1,800
(average) |
| Redwood |
0% |
Not
available |
| Renville |
5% |
$1,318-$1,963 |
| Rock |
5-20% |
$1,290-$2,089 |
| Swift |
12-15% |
$700-$1,700 |
| Yellow Medicine |
6% |
$608-$1,571 |
* Farmland in the green acres program is valued at $1,850
to $2,800, but farmers are assessed based on the lower values.
Source: county assessors Compiled
by Nancy L. Torner
Data for this chart is included in the file
that holds the text versions of these stories. Click
here
to link to an Excel version of this chart.
Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links