Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links
State must curtail dirty energy
now to meet clean energy goals by 2040
By Nancy L. Torner
Center for Rural and Regional Studies
Minnesota risks serious consequences if it continues
its "business as usual" approach to electricity production,
distribution and use, according to a report from a nonprofit
public-affairs group.
The state's electric power industry is organized
and regulated based on federal laws enacted in the 1930s, the
report from a 34-member energy committee of the Citizens League
says. However, federal laws are changing.
"Through our inaction, we are setting ourselves
up to be overtaken by events," the report says. "We are intent
on maintaining our relatively low electrical energy prices,
but we appear indifferent to the restructuring and regionalization
of electric power markets, which will limit our ability to control
price fluctuations and ensure reliable supplies.
Text
version of this story
Electric
Usage
| User |
Percentage |
| Industrial |
53
|
| Commercial |
20
|
| Residential |
27
|
Source:
Reis and EIA
Data from this chart is included in the
text version of this story. Click here
to link to an Excel version of this chart.
|
|
|
"At the same time, we are forfeiting our position
as a leader in environmental protection as we rely on federal
environmental laws to protect our air quality."
The committee began studying the electricity
supply about 18 months ago out of concern over the state's ability
to meet future demands. While the study relieves worries about
supply, it raises an alarm that Minnesota is facing serious
economic and environmental problems if it fails to reduce its
reliance on coal-fired energy plants and to embrace new technologies,
the report says.
About 75 percent of the state's energy comes
from coal-fired plants, which pollute the environment and give
rise to smog, crop damage and health problems and contribute
to global warming, the report says. Another 17 percent of its
energy comes from nuclear-powered plants, 3 percent from hydroelectric
and 5 percent from all other sources, such as wood and wind.
Because power plants have a life expectancy of
40 years or more, it is realistic to meet new energy policy
goals in 2040 if the state begins working toward these goals
immediately, the report says.
"A power generating plant installed today will
still be in service in 2040," the report says. "In the next
10 years, generating capacity representing about 25 percent
of Minnesota's power supply will be installed, either to replace
old capacity or to add new capacity. Clearly, our success or
failure in 2040 will be largely determined by what we do in
the next decade."
League
makes recommendations
The Citizen's League is an independent, nonpartisan
group formed 50 years ago in the Twin Cities area. It is active
in public affairs research and education. Its report, "Powering
Up Minnesota's Energy Future: Act Now on a Long-Term Vision,"
lists the following conclusions and recommendations:
* Neither the state nor the electric power industry
has been aggressive enough in using power sources that provide
reliable supplies without cumulative and unacceptable damage
to the environment.
* Emphasis on low prices ignores health care
and environmental cleanup costs related to power plant emissions,
which Minnesotans pay for in other ways. However, changing federal
policies -- particularly efforts to introduce competition into
wholesale electricity markets -- are likely to prompt the industry
to take into account all costs associated with electric power
generation and use.
Additionally, because electricity moves over
longer and longer distances and much of the state's electricity
comes from elsewhere, regional competitive market considerations
increasingly will determine prices.
* Regulating energy and environmental issues
separately prevents a needed balance between the two. Minnesota
lags behind other states in conserving and efficiently using
electricity; California, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon
and Texas all are tightening regulatory links between energy
and the environment, forcing shifts away from fossil fuels,
and funding research, development and education programs to
position themselves as leaders.
* The state should neither plan for nor expect
an increase in the role of nuclear energy. At the same time,
nuclear fuel will and should continue to provide a significant
fraction of the state's electricity.
* Companies selling electrical energy on the
retail market should operate under a permit system that limits
and gradually reduces power plant carbon emissions, which contribute
to global warming. Permits should regulate emissions of other
pollutants as well.
* The electric transmission grid needs greater
capacity and flexibility to make it easier for independent power
producers to plug into the system. This would allow the state
to take maximum advantage of renewable resources, such as wind,
solar and biomass energy.
Clean
energy
By nature, wind and solar power sometimes goes
to waste because these methods produce energy when no one needs
it. At other times, energy is unavailable when needed. New developments
in fuel cell technology may overcome these problems by allowing
electrical energy storage in the form of hydrogen, the report
says. However, state investment in research and development
in this area is negligible.
State legislators missed an opportunity to advance
renewable energy efforts when they failed in 2001 to enact a
renewable energy standard into law, according to a report from
Minnesotan's for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ME3), a nonprofit
group that advocates clean, efficient and fair energy systems.
State law asks for "good faith efforts" from
utilities to attain 10 percent of their energy from renewable
sources by 2015. Meanwhile, California law requires utilities
to purchased 20 percent of their electricity from renewable
sources by 2017. Texas requires the installation of 2,000 megawatts
of new renewable energy sources by 2009. Iowa and 10 other states
also mandate renewable energy standards by law, the report says.
"Minnesota is dependent on coal-fired plants
for 75 percent of the electricity we consume, putting us about
50 percent above the national average in our dependence on coal,"
the report says. "Reducing this dependence by cleaning up and
switching from coal-fired generation, with a phased-in replacement
by cleaner technologies, will benefit the health of our citizens
and the environment of our state."
|
New
Electric Generation Projects in Progress
|
| PROJECT |
LOCATION |
TYPE |
YEAR |
SIZE |
FUEL |
| Under
Construction (139 MW) |
|
Dakota |
|
|
|
|
| Black Dog |
County |
Intermediate |
2002 |
114
MW |
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District |
|
|
|
|
|
| Heating |
St. Paul |
Baseload |
|
25
MW |
Waste Wood |
| Approved
Purchase Power Agreement (PPA) (100 MW) |
| EPS/Beck |
|
Baseload |
|
50
MW |
Whole Trees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FibroMinn |
Benson |
Baseload |
|
50
MW |
Turkey Litter |
| Won All-Source
Bid, PPA Pending (250 MW) |
| Navitas/NEA |
|
Intermediate |
|
50
MW |
Wind
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peaking |
|
250
MW |
|
| Other (268 MW) |
| Bid Selection |
|
|
|
|
| in Process by |
|
|
|
|
| Xcel Energy |
|
Intermediate |
80 MW |
Wind |
| LTV Power |
Taconite |
|
|
|
| Plant |
Harbor |
Baseload |
188 MW |
Coal |
Source: Minnesota Energy Planning Report 2001, Minnesota
Department of Commerce
Data from this chart is included in the text version of this
story. Click here
to link to an Excel version of this chart.
Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism
Links