Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links
Environmental study sets baseline
for state
May 5, 2003
By Nancy L. Torner
Center for Rural and Regional Studies
Southwest Minnesota State University
Text
version of this story
Negative impacts on Minnesota's environment come
foremost from particles in air, according to a recent report from
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).
Other significant impacts come from phosphorus,
transported sediment, temperature increases/climate change and
habitat modification, according to agency experts, who say these
substances and conditions are widespread in the environment, their
effects are severe and only slowly reversible and they affect
large populations.
Topping the list of factors contributing to these
impacts are vehicles and equipment; coal-fired power plants; agricultural
runoff; urban development and runoff; and pesticide use, both
urban and rural, experts said in the report.
The Environmental Information Report is a first
edition from the agency's Environmental Outcomes Division, intended
as a baseline of current conditions for assessing future environmental
change. It evaluates the physical, chemical and biological condition
of Minnesota's environment to identify threats to humans and ecosystems
that remain today despite previous and ongoing cleanup efforts.
In drafting the report, a multidisciplinary team
looked at environmental risks to human and ecosystem health and
to quality of life; socioeconomic conditions of air, water, land
and biota; and pollution sources, impacts and trends. Health issues
rated high among their concerns.
"Preventing exposure to cancer-causing substances
is an important focus of various MPCA pollution control programs,"
the report said.
Nearly 50 percent of Minnesotans contract some
form of cancer during their lives and cancer accounts for about
24 percent of all deaths in Minnesota, the report said. Major
cardiovascular diseases account for about 36 percent of deaths.
Diet/obesity and smoking cause a majority of cancer
incidences and deaths in the state. Pollution is responsible for
roughly 2 percent of all U.S. cancer deaths, the report said.
"Cancer stressors that may affect large populations
are particles in air, toxic chemicals in air, toxic chemicals
in food and excess UV radiation," the report said. "Of these,
the air stressors -- particles and toxic chemicals -- have a high
potential to worsen because of trends we are seeing in Minnesota."
Important sources of air stressors include industrial
activity, energy production from coal, and on-road vehicle and
off-road equipment use. Each of these activities has increased
and will likely continue to increase, although technology improvements,
alternative fuel development and control strategies may lessen
the impact of particles and toxics by reducing them at their source,
the report said.
Additionally, several socioeconomic trends may
have implications for non-cancer acute impacts on human health
-- which include asthma attacks, heat stress and headaches --
and for non-cancer chronic impacts on human health -- which include
long-term respiratory impairment, heart and lung disease and immunological
disorders, the report said.
It is difficult to put these environmental-related
health impacts into context with other health impacts because
of incomplete knowledge on cause and effect and the limited nature
of disease and death statistics, the report said. However, population
growth and migration to urban areas, along with consumptive behavior,
will likely worsen environmental impacts from transportation,
energy production and waste disposal.
Stress on aquatic organisms also persists as commercial
and residential development continues at a rapid rate in urban
areas, increasing runoff that carries phosphorus, nitrogen, sediment
and toxics to streams and lakes, the report said. Meanwhile, rural
Minnesota continues to produce large amounts of pollution from
row crop production and livestock operations. Additionally, parts
of rural Minnesota also are experiencing rapid development, much
of it to satisfy the desires of urban residents who want to "get
away" from cities.
The state monitors about 5 percent of its river
and stream miles and 60 percent of its lake acres, and two-thirds
of them meet water quality standards and criteria designed to
protect aquatic life, the report said. Very little monitoring
has been done to assess the health of pre-settlement wetland acres
that remain.
Most problems with surface water quality now come
from non-point sources of pollution, the report said. Stream miles
and lake acres considered impaired by non-point sources are about
seven times greater than those impaired by point sources.
Technology to address non-point source pollution
is generally well established and cost effective, but success
will require substantial changes in land-use practices by a great
number of different parties, the report said.
"The agency has a number of programs addressing
non-point sources, generally in partnership with local governments
and organizations, but overall the efforts are relatively young
and have yet to show general, statewide results," the report said.
Other findings in the report include:
Drainage activity has tapered off in the
last two decades but still takes place in growing urban areas
for roads, airports, and residential and industrial development.
Minnesota contains about five million acres of drained land and
27,000 miles of constructed ditches. About half of the state's
18.6 million wetland acres have been drained and streams in the
west and south have undergone extensive channeling.
The state has nearly 150,000 highway miles
and the number of vehicle miles driven per person has increased
from 6,992 in 1980 to more than 10,000 in 2000. Further increases
are likely over the next 20 years, requiring construction of more
highways that will result in more drainage of wetlands, habitat
fragmentation, and transport of chemicals and exotic species.
Phosphorus concentrations have decreased
at 78 percent of monitored stream sites and have shown trends
of increasing at 1 percent of the sites. Lakes also show a trend
toward better water quality at most monitored sites.
Minnesota is the sixth largest user of nitrogen
fertilizers in the United States, applying more than 600,000 tons
annually. Heavy agriculture in the Minnesota River Basin is a
large contributor of nitrate-nitrogen to the Mississippi River
and hence the Gulf of Mexico.
Timber production has increased from 2.3
million cords in 1980 to 3.8 million cords in 1999, although the
rate of harvest held steady in the 1990s. Cropland acres decreased
between 1982 and 1997 while the number of grassland and urban
acres increased.
The entire report is available on the Internet
at: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/publications/ei-report.html/
Journalism
Project | Stories | Contributors
| Journalism Links