|
BOT Standard |
NCATE 2002
Target Standard |
Current
Practice Described |
Best Evidence/ Existing Data |
Assessment of
Current Practices |
Data/Evidence
Needed |
Targeted
Standard Recommendations |
|||||
|
A(1)
The institution has high quality professional education programs that are
cohesive, comprehensive, and based on research, theory, and accepted
practice. |
Conceptual Framework
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
A(2)
The institution requires that candidates in teacher preparation programs
complete a professional sequence of courses based on the components under
part 8710.2000. |
S1 Pedagogical Content
Knowledge. Teacher
candidates reflect a thorough understanding of
pedagogical content knowledge delineated in professional, state, and
institutional standards. They have in-depth understanding of the subject
matter that they plan to teach, allowing them to provide multiple explanations
and instructional strategies so that all students learn. They present the
content to students in challenging, clear, and
compelling ways and integrate technology appropriately. S1 Professional Pedagogical Knowledge and Skills Teacher candidates reflect
a thorough understanding of pedagogical content knowledge delineated in
professional, state, and institutional standards. They have in-depth
understanding of the subject matter that they plan to teach, allowing them to
provide multiple explanations and instructional strategies so that all
students learn. They present the content to students in challenging, clear, and
compelling ways and integrate technology appropriately. S1 Dispositions for All CandidatesCandidates
work with students, families, and communities in ways that reflect the
dispositions expected of professional
educators as delineated in professional, state, and institutional
standards. Candidates recognize when their
own dispositions may need to be adjusted and are able to develop plans to do
so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
A(3)
Assessment and evaluation are integral components of the professional
education sequence and are used to monitor teacher candidate performance and
program effectiveness. |
S1 Student Learning for Teacher Candidates Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning, make appropriate adjustments to instruction, monitor student learning, and have a positive effect on learning for all students. S2 Assessment SystemThe unit, with the involvement of its professional community, is implementing an assessment system that reflects the conceptual framework(s) and incorporates candidate proficiencies outlined in professional and state standards. The unit continuously examines the validity and utility of the data produced through assessments and makes modifications to keep abreast of changes in assessment technology and in professional standards. Decisions about candidate performance are based on multiple assessments made at multiple points before program completion. Data show the strong relationship of performance assessments to candidate success. The unit conducts thorough studies to establish fairness, accuracy, and consistency of its performance assessment procedures. It also makes changes in its practices consistent with the results of these studies. S2 Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation The unit is implementing its assessment system and providing regular and comprehensive data on program quality, unit operations, and candidate performance at each stage of a program, including the first years of practice. Data from candidates, graduates, faculty, and other members of the professional community are based on multiple assessments from both internal and external sources. The unit maintains a record of formal candidate complaints and documentation of their resolution. Data are regularly and systematically collected, compiled, summarized, analyzed, and reported publicly for the purpose of improving candidate performance, program quality, and unit operations. The unit is developing and testing different information technologies to improve its assessment system. S2 Use of Data for Program Improvement The
unit has fully developed evaluations and continuously searches for stronger
relationships in the evaluations, revising both the underlying data systems
and analytic techniques as necessary.
The unit not only makes changes when evaluations indicate, but also
systematically studies the effects of any changes to assure that the intended
program strengthening occurs and that there are no adverse consequences. Candidates and faculty review data on
their performance regularly and develop plans for improvement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||